Cases 21 - 30 of 89
BARBER v. WARD ET AL
as 5:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
AHMOUD RENAULT BARBER
Defendant:
TIMOTHY WARD, TYRONE OLIVER and WILCOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOOMER v. ADAMS
as 1:2023cv00119
Petitioner:
KASAEM BERNARD TOOMER
Respondent:
TYRONE OLIVER and Warden ROBERT ADAMS, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STONE v. JORDAN et al
as 5:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
RAYMON H STONE and RAYMON H STONE, JR
Defendant:
JANICE JORDAN, GREGORY SAMPSON, PASHION CHAMBERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCNAIR v. VANSTONE et al
as 1:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
OLLIE MCNAIR
Defendant:
RICHARD J VANSTONE, DENISE MARSHALL, KENNETH B HODGES, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK R MARTIN
Defendant:
Warden S EMMONS, C MIMS, R SHROPSHIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. BEASLEY
as 7:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
ROY MANDELL SMITH
Defendant:
Lt AARON KIRK, Supervisor KEVIN CONNOLLY, NED M MIKULA and others
Respondent:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NORTHERN v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
QUINCY NORTHERN
Defendant:
TIMOTHY WARD and TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. KEMP et al
as 5:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MALIK BEY Secured Party doing business as GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
BRIAN KEMP, TYRONE OLIVER and JENNIFER WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLIVER v. BROWN
as 5:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
OLIVER MONROE, JR
Defendant:
BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITTENBURG v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOYT WHITTENBURG
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER and Warden TOMMY BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
