Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Bugge et al v. Roberts et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00065
Plaintiff: Peter A Bugge, Peter A Bugge, Troy P Crumbley and others
Defendant: Kevin Roberts, Dannie Thompson, Christine Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Thompson et al
as 1:2008cv00051
Plaintiff: Kenneth Lee Adams
Defendant: Dannie Thompson, Rondey Stamey, Remika Christian and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harris v. Thompson et al
as 1:2007cv00192
Plaintiff: Wesley Vandale Harris
Defendant: Dannie Thompson and Administration of Calhoun State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv00189
Plaintiff: Wesley Vandale Harris
Defendant: Georgia Department of Corrections, Calhoun State Prison, Dannie Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Thompson et al
as 4:2007cv00130
Petitioner: Timothy Murphy
Respondent: Danny Thompson, Douglas C. Pullen and Robert L. Wadkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Thompson
as 5:2007cv00253
Petitioner: Demond S. Johnson
Respondent: Dannie Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Redd v. Thompson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00087
Plaintiff: William Stanley Redd
Defendant: Dannie Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stocks v. Thompson et al
as 1:2007cv00086
Plaintiff: Howard Willie Stocks
Defendant: Dannie Thompson, Christine Cross and Horace Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruffin v. Thompson
as 5:2007cv00075
Petitioner: Judson Ruffin
Respondent: Dannie Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?