Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 21 - 30 of 46
CASSADY v. DOZIER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2018cv00158
Defendant: DARREN JACKSON, LESLEY PLUGGE, DON BLAKELY and others
Plaintiff: DAVID DWAYNE CASSADY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERRELL v. CALHOUN STATE PRISON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00332
Respondent: CALHOUN STATE PRISON, COMMISSIONER GREGORY DOZIER, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Petitioner: WILLIE JAMES TERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CORMICAN v. DOZIER
as 5:2018cv00319
Defendant: Commissioner GREGORY DOZIER
Plaintiff: JAMES ELIAS CORMICAN, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUDY v. DOZIER et al
as 1:2018cv00165
Defendant: Chaplain SIMMONS, Cert Sgt MUZZY, Commissioner GREGORY DOZIER and others
Plaintiff: MITCHELL LUDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. DOZIER et al
as 7:2018cv00121
Defendant: KATRINA HALL, GARY VOWELL, KEVIN HUTTO and others
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER SINTEL KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOGAN v. DEAL et al
as 1:2018cv00131
Plaintiff: RICKY LAMAR HOGAN
Defendant: GOVERNOR NATHAN DEAL, STATE ATTORNEY GENER CHRISTOPHER CARR and COMMISSIONER GREGORY DOZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. DOZIER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00245
Defendant: CHIEF COUNSELOR STREETER, BRUCE CHATMAN, MEDICAL DIRECTOR SHARON LEWIS and others
Plaintiff: WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENRY v. DOZIER et al
as 1:2018cv00090
Plaintiff: FLOYD ANTONIO HENRY
Defendant: GREGORY DOZIER and BENJAMIN FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LALLY v. DOZIER
as 5:2018cv00129
Plaintiff: JAMES S LALLY
Defendant: GREGORY DOZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUNDY v. FORD et al
as 1:2018cv00072
Plaintiff: MYLES E LUNDY, JR
Defendant: BENJAMIN FORD, DARRELL WARREN, GREGORY DOZIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?