Cases 31 - 40 of 1,230
SMILEY v. SMITH
as 1:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Marcus Smiley
Respondent:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OBEGINSKI v. WALKER
as 5:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
AARON OBEGINSKI
Respondent:
WARDEN VICTOR WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COOK v. PERRY
as 3:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
DANIEL DELANE COOK
Respondent:
WARDEN J KEVIN PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hallman v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HALLMAN
Defendant:
WARDEN OTIS SMITH, JONES and SABRINA PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROACH v. EMMONS
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
EARL ROACH
Defendant:
WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SULLIVAN v. WARD et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
MARIO ROMOAN SULLIVAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WARDEN WALTER BARRY, WARDEN DARRIN MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITTLE v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
THOMAS ANDREW WHITTLE
Respondent:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, STATE OF GEORGIA and KELLI ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. WITHERS
as 1:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
WILLIAM SMITH, III
Respondent:
WARDEN SHANNON D WITHERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WOODS v. WIZA
as 4:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Respondent:
Warden SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MADISON v. BERRY et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MADISON
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, MR CLARK, MR GARDENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
