Cases 31 - 40 of 886
MORRIS v. RUMER
as 4:2023cv00098
Petitioner:
HERMAN MORRIS, JR
Respondent:
Judge WILLIAM C RUMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STANLEY v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
ALVIN STANLEY
Defendant:
TIMOTHY C WARD, WARDEN WHITENTIN, WARDEN BARNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEELER v. POLITE et al
as 5:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN A WHEELER
Defendant:
JOSEPH POLITE, BRIAN KEMP, TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK R MARTIN
Defendant:
Warden S EMMONS, C MIMS, R SHROPSHIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEELER v. POLITE et al
as 5:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN A WHEELER
Defendant:
JOSEPH POLITE, BRIAN KEMP, TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCURTY v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
DREXEL MCCURTY
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, TIMOTHY C WARD, PHOEBE PUTNEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOSTER v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
JOHN M FOSTER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WILKES, WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BISHOP v. PANE et al
as 3:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ALAN BISHOP
Defendant:
WARDEN JAMES PANE, TIMOTHY C WARD, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHIPMAN v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY C SHIPMAN
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
STANLEY v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
ALVIN G STANLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, AMIE SMITH, CELLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
