Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 31 - 40 of 46
GARNER v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2018cv00088
Plaintiff: THOMAS GARNER
Defendant: HOMER BRYSON , WALTER BERRY , GREGORY DOZIER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAVIES v. DEAL et al
as 5:2018cv00086
Plaintiff: DALE SCOTT DAVIES
Defendant: NATHAN DEAL, GREGORY DOZIER, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. DOZIER
as 5:2018cv00063
Petitioner: TYRONE A JONES
Respondent: GREGORY DOZIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CASSADY v. DOZIER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00495
Plaintiff: DAVID DWAYNE CASSADY
Defendant: GREGORY DOZIER, CEDRIC TAYLOR, MICHAEL PITTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEIBERT v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2017cv00496
Plaintiff: STEVEN JACOB SEIBERT
Defendant: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GREGORY DOZIER, SCOTT CRICKMAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERRELL v. DOZIER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00477
Petitioner: WILLIE TERRELL
Respondent: GREGORY DOZIER, TJ CONLEY, KARL FORT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TERRELL v. DOZIER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00478
Petitioner: WILLIE JAMES TERRELL, JR
Respondent: GREGORY DOZIER, DOC, W.A.S.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LANEY v. FORD et al
as 1:2017cv00210
Plaintiff: FESSE LEE LANEY
Defendant: BENJAMIN FORD and GREGORY DOZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AYTON v. DOZIER et al
as 1:2017cv00142
Plaintiff: RONALD G AYTON
Defendant: GREGORY DOZIER, TONY HAILES and BENJAMIN FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PODNIESTRZANSKI v. DOZIER et al
as 1:2017cv00128
Plaintiff: MICHAEL PODNIESTRZANSKI
Defendant: GREGORY DOZIER and BENJAMIN FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?