Cases 41 - 50 of 583
BOYD v. BAILEY et al
as 5:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
PAUL BAILEY and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. LINDQUIST et al
as 7:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
BRUCE JAMES
Defendant:
BEN LINDQUIST, SILVIS, AMBROSE, LINDQUIST, COCH P.C., THOMASVILLE BRANCSHARE D/B/A THOMASVILLE NATIONAL BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MITCHELL v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
KERRY S MITCHELL
Defendant:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, WARDEN CHARLES MIMMS, LIEUTENANT ROSEVELT GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWELL v. COLUMBUS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN POWELL
Defendant:
COLUMBUS POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHN OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. RIVERBEND REH FAC ET
as 5:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS BOYD
Defendant:
RIVERBEND REH FAC ET and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. RIVERBEND REH FAC et al
as 5:2023cv00212
Petitioner:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD
Defendant:
RIVERBEND REH FAC and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS BOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v.JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
as 5:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
LANORRIS MOORE
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
POLK v. WAL MART STORES EAST LP
as 7:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
DOLRAY POLK
Defendant:
WAL MART STORES EAST LP, WAL MART STORES EAST LP doing business as WAL MART and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
EDWARDS v. WILSON et al
as 5:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARDS
Defendant:
WILSON, BERRY, CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
