Cases 41 - 50 of 191
DONLEY v. DOE et al
as 7:2018cv00190
Defendant:
CAPTAIN JAMES, JANE DOE, LT WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
CARROLE G DONLEY, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL et al v. SHEFFIELD et al
as 5:2018cv00415
Plaintiff:
CAROL TREECE POWELL and ELMER V POWELL
Defendant:
PREMIER CONSTRUCTION LLC, JERRY SHEFFIELD and KIMBERLY R SHEFFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWELL v. USA
as 5:2018cv00377
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JEFFREY THOMAS POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HAYWARD v. TOBY et al
as 5:2018cv00357
Defendant:
ANNETTE TOBY, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CANNON, REGIONAL DIRECTOR ROBERT TOOLE and others
Plaintiff:
BENNY HAYWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAJOR v. TARRELL et al
as 5:2018cv00356
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT MICHAEL CANNON, OFFICER SHAKEURA DANIELS, RICKY MYRICK and others
Plaintiff:
TROY S MAJOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. POWELL et al
as 5:2018cv00334
Defendant:
KAREN FORBS, DEPUTY WARDEN WILLIAM POWELL, JOHANNES GOODY and others
Plaintiff:
EUGENE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. BERRY et al
as 5:2018cv00331
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN THOMAS, WARDEN BERRY, UNIT MANAGER KANE and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. BERRY et al
as 5:2018cv00234
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN THOMAS, UNIT MANAGER KANE, WARDEN BERRY and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. SOUTHEAST GEORGIA PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE et al
as 7:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
LIN E DAVIS
Defendant:
JAMES L GARLAND, SOUTHEAST GEORGIA PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE, NATHAN DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DENNIS v. CANNON et al
as 5:2018cv00223
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JAMEL DENNIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CANNON, WILLIAM POWELL, GEORGE BALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
