Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
CHAPMAN SR v. SHAVERS et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
TREVON D CHAPMAN SR
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN BRIAN SHAVERS, DEPUTY WARDEN SPANN, DEPUTY WARDEN OSBORNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MADISON v. BELL -
as 7:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MADISON
Defendant:
JACOB BELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. TIFT COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL et al
as 7:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
TONYEL Y BELL
Defendant:
TIFT COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL and TIFT COUNTY GENERAL REGIONAL HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
MADISON v. BELL
as 7:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
TERRELL M. MADISON
Defendant:
JACOB BELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. WOODS et al
as 7:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
REMUS BELL
Defendant:
ANTHONY WOODS, BUDDY MOORE TRUCKING, INC. and NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BELL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 7:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
TONYEL Y BELL
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE) and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
BELL v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA DEWAYNE BELL
Defendant:
CARLOS THOMAS, DECATUR COUNTY JAIL and SERGEANT HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. TIFT COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL et al
as 7:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
TONYEL Y BELL
Defendant:
TIFT COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL and TIFT GENERAL HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
