Cases 1 - 10 of 18
CUMMINGS v GWINNETT COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, et al
as 3:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
LAMONT ANDRE CUMMINGS
Defendant:
GWINNET COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and GWINNET COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HARRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
MILTON KENT JOHNSON
Defendant:
MRS HARRISON, MR WILLIAMS, DR NWAUBEZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HARRISON et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
MILTON KENT JOHNSON
Defendant:
MRS HARRISON, MR WILLIAMS, DR NWAUBEZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, AHMAD HOLT, CLAY NIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. EMMERSEN et al
as 1:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
JUDGE DAVID EMMERSEN, JUDGE ANN HARRIS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUMMINGS v. BERRY et al
as 5:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS CUMMINGS
Defendant:
WARDEN BERRY WALTER, DEPUTY ERIC MARTIN, CHIEF CONSELOR WHIPPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAYTON v. GOODMAN et al
as 5:2021cv00418
Defendant:
SERGEANT FLOYD EDWARD, BRANDON GOODMAN, BARBARA CUMMING and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. EDWARD et al
as 5:2021cv00412
Defendant:
CO2 FLOYD EDWARD, EDWARD FLOYD, EDWARD and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. GOODMAN et al
as 5:2021cv00310
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
CO2 BRANDON GOODMAN, UNIT MANAGER BARBARA CUMMING, Warden WALTER BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUMMINGS v. JORGE'S TIRE REPAIR LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00212
Defendant:
JORGE'S TIRE REPAIR LLC and JORGE SAMUDIO
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CUMMINGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
