Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
PACE v. COLQUITT COUNTY GEORGIA JAIL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00111
Plaintiff: WILLIE PACE
Defendant: COLQUITT COUNTY GEORGIA JAIL and INVESTIGATOR NATHAN CATO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. REYNOLDS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00013
Plaintiff: JENNIFER JOHNSON
Defendant: EDWARD REYNOLDS, CITY OF BAINBRIDGE, TERESA COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARBER v. THE CATO CORPORATION
as 5:2017cv00117
Plaintiff: TERESA BARBER
Defendant: THE CATO CORPORATION and SANDY PLAINS JUNCTION LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BOYD v. HALL et al
as 1:2017cv00033
Petitioner: AHQUAN DANTE BOYD
Respondent: PHILIP HALL, ADAM W CATO and KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CATO v. BERRYHILL
as 4:2017cv00027
Plaintiff: DAVID W CATO
Defendant: NANCY A BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gaines v. CATO et al
as 1:2015cv00115
Plaintiff: SAMUEL GAINES, JR
Defendant: A WALLACE CATO, E P LAMB, ROBERT CASTERLINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRACE v. DECATUR COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 1:2015cv00070
Plaintiff: SYLVESTER GRACE
Defendant: DECATUR COUNTY GEORGIA and A WALLACE CATO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWARD v. HEAD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00338
Plaintiff: NEAL HOWARD
Defendant: FRED HEAD, JOHN DOE, EVAN JOSEPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOUGLAS v. POPE et al
as 5:2012cv00403
Plaintiff: DONALD LEE DOUGLAS
Defendant: GENE POPE , SEAN WALLACE , CHRIS CATO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ONeal v. Cato We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00339
Plaintiff: Victor Lamar ONeal
Defendant: Lt Cato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?