Cases 1 - 10 of 48
MORGAN v. DOZIER et al
as 7:2021cv00164
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LAMAR MORGAN
Defendant:
GREGORY C DOZIER, CHRISTOPHER CARR, MICHAEL BARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAYTON v. BRASHER et al
as 5:2019cv00398
Defendant:
MARTIN, LT INGRAM, EASTER and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. DOZIER et al
as 1:2019cv00175
Plaintiff:
TESFA MILLER
Defendant:
Warden WALTER BERRY, GREGORY C DOZIER and KENNETH MANTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LLOYD v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00353
Defendant:
JACK RANDALL SAULS, CLAY NIX, RICKY MYRICK and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOSEPH LLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2019cv00333
Plaintiff:
DRASHAWN MITCHELL
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER GREGORY C DOZIER, CO1 VICTORIA LAMAR and WARDEN ANNETTIA L ASHLEY-TOBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2019cv00240
Petitioner:
GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR
Respondent:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GREGORY C DOZIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TREADWELL v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2019cv00235
Plaintiff:
DEANTHONY TREADWELL and DAVID JAMALSON
Defendant:
LT DAVIS, LIEUTENANT RONNIE SHOEMAKER, MCCRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00227
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL MOSS
Defendant:
JACK RANDALL SAULS, TREVONZA BOBBITT, Clay Nix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAISON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00228
Defendant:
CLAY NIX, JACK RANDALL SAULS, TREVONZA BOBBITT and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ELIJAH FAISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
DOTSON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00225
Defendant:
JACK RANDALL SAULS, TREVONZA BOBBITT, CLAY NIX and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DOTSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
