Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
JONES v. MOSLEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00425
Plaintiff: JAMES DEAN JONES
Defendant: SHANNON MOSLEY and PRIYANKA BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00245
Petitioner: JAMES DEAN JONES
Respondent: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. CHANEY et al
as 4:2021cv00042
Plaintiff: JAMES DEON JONES
Defendant: ARTHUR CHANEY, STATE TRANSITIONAL CENTERS and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. GEORGIA et al
as 4:2020cv00022
Defendant: WITAKER, COLLINS, RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON and others
Plaintiff: JAMES DEON JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. MONROE GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv00050
Defendant: MONROE GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY and FCCI INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff: JAMES HENRY JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
JONES v. TENNANT TRUCK LINES INC et al
as 1:2013cv00039
Plaintiff: JAMES CHRISTOPHER JONES
Defendant: TENNANT TRUCK LINES INC , JACKIE LYNN KINLEY and NATIONAL INTERSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
JONES v. DOES
as 5:2012cv00335
Plaintiff: JAMES LEE JONES
Defendant: JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Koon We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00026
Petitioner: Edward James Anthony Jones
Respondent: Jack Koon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Parole/Probation Officer Reddicks
as 5:2007cv00318
Plaintiff: James M. Jones
Defendant: Parole/Probation Officer Reddicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?