Cases 1 - 10 of 43
STEVENS v. 3 SQUARES DINER, LLC
as 7:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
JAMES STEVENS, JESSICA MCCALL, BRIANA PALMER and others
Defendant:
3 SQUARES DINER LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, AHMAD HOLT, CLAY NIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. EMMERSEN et al
as 1:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
JUDGE DAVID EMMERSEN, JUDGE ANN HARRIS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. PALMER et al
as 1:2021cv00142
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WASHINGTON WHITE, JR
Defendant:
SGT GABRIEL PALMER, D O LANELY, D O WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. CHENY et al
as 1:2021cv00104
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, DO PALMER, DO RUSS and others
Plaintiff:
PRENTICE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIBLEY v. MITCHELL COUNTY CAMP INSTITUTION et al
as 1:2021cv00001
Defendant:
Bruce Muzzy, Kim McCloud, DO JOSEPH COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
Donshawn B. Sibley and DONSHAWN B SIBLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY et al
as 1:2020cv00240
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY, SGT GABRIEL D PALMER, D O JUNDARRIUS BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
LUCAS DANIEL HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. LANE et al
as 5:2020cv00418
Defendant:
INVESTIGATOR TREY BURGAMY, NURSE CHRISTY LANE, JAILER QUANNA WALKER and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID KEITH GREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. PALMER et al
as 5:2020cv00372
Petitioner:
JIMMY JACKSON
Respondent:
EVA ROGERS and JUDGE KATHY S PALMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MORRISON v. WHITE et al
as 5:2020cv00156
Defendant:
PATRICIA STYLES, CAPTAIN BROWN, LANE and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RAY MORRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
