Cases 1 - 10 of 44
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, FACILITIES DIRECTOR JACK KOON, JOHNNY SIKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, AHMAD HOLT, CLAY NIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 7:2020cv00113
Defendant:
LISA FOUNTAIN, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 7:2020cv00089
Defendant:
CLYDE ALLEN, LISA FOUNTAIN, JACK KOON and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COCHRAN v. MYRICK et al
as 1:2019cv00182
Defendant:
WARDEN DESIGNEE RUSSELL HOLLMAN, DEPUTY WARDEN NATHANIEL WILLIAMS, CO BELL and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO BERNARD COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZAVALA v. WARD, et al.
as 5:2019cv00383
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CANNON, GENERAL COUNSELOR JON GOODY, DEPUTY WARDEN JOSEPH POLITE and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ZAVALA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LLOYD v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00353
Defendant:
JACK RANDALL SAULS, CLAY NIX, RICKY MYRICK and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOSEPH LLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAISON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00228
Defendant:
CLAY NIX, JACK RANDALL SAULS, TREVONZA BOBBITT and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ELIJAH FAISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
