Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Walker v. Ragazino et al
as 1:2023cv02827
Plaintiff:
Toni P. Walker and Anthony Walker, Sr.
Defendant:
James Eric Ragazino, Delquis R. Mendoza, Beverly Dwyer and others
Allen et al v. Owens et al
as 1:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Scott Allen and Karen Allen
Defendant:
Cobb County Sheriff Craig Owens, Former Cobb County Sheriff Colonel Temetris Atkins, Wellpath, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Booth v. Douglas County et al
as 1:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
John David Booth
Defendant:
Douglas County, Georgia Douglas County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Deputy Matthew Christopher Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Licari v. Hughes et al
as 1:2021cv04034
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Licari
Defendant:
Rena Hughes, Mary Kay Holthus, Elizabeth Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brackett v. Atkins
as 2:2021cv00184
Plaintiff:
William Edward Brackett
Defendant:
Deputy Michael S. Atkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert et al v. City of Pine Lake, Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv00495
Plaintiff:
Elisha Gilbert, Jr.
Defendant:
R. Javoyne Hicks, Sarai Y'hudah-Green, Otanya Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harpo v. Howard et al
as 1:2016cv03876
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo
Defendant:
Burnice A. Howard, James H. Atkins, Cornelius Abraham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Miller et al
as 1:2014cv01192
Plaintiff:
Laura Y. Allen
Defendant:
Phil Miller , S. Brook and Matthew Christopher Atkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Nelson v. DeKalb County et al
as 1:2012cv02865
Plaintiff:
Hantz Nelson
Defendant:
DeKalb County, Billy Atkins and Thomas Brown
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Buccini v. Hartsfield Atkins & Hartsfield, et al.
as 1:2012cv00300
Plaintiff:
K K Buccini
Defendant:
Hartsfield Atkins & Hartsfield, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
