Cases 81 - 90 of 519
Provost v. WRH Realty Services, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02971
Plaintiff:
Dominique Provost
Defendant:
WRH Realty Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Dorismond v. Clayton County Board of Commissioners
as 1:2022cv02880
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Dorismond
Defendant:
Clayton County Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Rodriguez v. Medline Industries, LP
as 1:2022cv03089
Defendant:
Medline Industries, LP and Medline Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Juan Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Vickery v. Amec Foster Wheeler Kamtech, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03035
Plaintiff:
James Wade Vickery
Defendant:
Amec Foster Wheeler Kamtech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Stephens v. The City of Helen
as 2:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Brian Stephens
Defendant:
The City of Helen and Jerry M. Elkins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
McDonald v. Piedmont Healthcare, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02746
Plaintiff:
Sharon McDonald
Defendant:
Piedmont Healthcare, Inc. doing business as Coliseum Medical Center, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Wong v. Shepherd Spinal Center Inc.
as 1:2022cv02423
Plaintiff:
Jessica Wong
Defendant:
Shepherd Spinal Center Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Warner v. City Of Atlanta
as 1:2022cv02511
Plaintiff:
Remando D. Warner
Defendant:
City Of Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Hall v. Airgas USA, LLC
as 1:2022cv02482
Plaintiff:
Wanda Hall
Defendant:
Airgas USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Stanton v. Union General Hospital, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Stanton
Defendant:
Union General Hospital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
