Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 91 - 100 of 205
Jones et al v. Mowrey et al
as 1:2015cv04497
Plaintiff: Anwah Jones and William S. Watkins
Defendant: Brandon L. Mowrey, James G. Carson, Robert C. Bagwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Collett et al
as 1:2015cv04408
Plaintiff: Willie Lois Franklin
Defendant: Christopher Collett, Angela E. Davis, Megan N. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. The Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv04354
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: The Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia , George P. Bud Peterson , Peter Paquette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yates v. The City of Roswell
as 1:2015cv03865
Plaintiff: Jeffrey P. Yates
Defendant: The City of Roswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03501
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Colvard v. Thompson et al
as 1:2015cv03196
Plaintiff: Murray M. Colvard
Defendant: Hugh P. Thompson and GA Supreme Court Council
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nzinga v. Christy et al
as 1:2015cv02865
Plaintiff: Hashim Nzinga
Defendant: P. L Christy and DeKalb County Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02391
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01688
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hill v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2015cv01421
Plaintiff: Corey D. Hill
Defendant: City of Atlanta , City of Atlanta Police Department , D. J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?