Cases 131 - 140 of 146
Williams et al v. Fulton County et al
as 1:2008cv03744
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Williams and Johan Williams
Defendant:
Fulton County, Zach Williams, Alfred Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Cherokee County, Georgia
as 1:2008cv03669
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Moore
Defendant:
Cherokee County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Williams v. Hooks et al
as 1:2007cv02039
Plaintiff:
Rady Williams
Defendant:
Patricia Hooks, Mike Anderson, Judy Forty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Williams v. Hooks et al
as 1:2007mi00243
Plaintiff:
Rady Williams
Defendant:
Patricia Hooks, Mike Anderson, Judy Forty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hicks et al v. Department of Human Resources (DHR) et al
as 1:2007cv00845
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Hicks, Eddie Hicks, Jr. and Sylvernus Richard Osagu, II
Defendant:
Department of Human Resources (DHR), Richmond County Department of Family and Children Services, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
