Cases 21 - 30 of 85
Pitts v. Fowler et al
as 1:2018cv03767
Plaintiff:
Johnny Paul Pitts
Defendant:
Tommie L. Fowler, John Doe(s) 1-3, Tony Hailes, Sr. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Foster et al v. Lofton et al
as 2:2017cv00278
Plaintiff:
Carrie Foster and Tony Foster
Defendant:
Marc Lofton, Statham Police Chief Allan Johnston and The City of Statham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. Rockdale County School District et al
as 1:2017cv01197
Plaintiff:
Schyler Harris and Tracy Davis
Defendant:
Rockdale County School District , Richard Autry , Tiwon Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Stone et al v. Magistrate/Troup County, Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv00185
Plaintiff:
Little Stone
Defendant:
Magistrate/Troup County, Georgia, Michael Garett, Jeannett Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Holmes v. Bivins et al
as 1:2016cv01161
Plaintiff:
Craig Holmes
Defendant:
M. Bivins, Pembrooke Homeowners, Inc. and Tony Aquila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Bartow County Georgia et al
as 4:2015cv00168
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray West
Defendant:
Bartow County Georgia, City of Emerson Georgia, Bryson Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kight v. United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia
as 1:2015cv02202
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Kight, Sr.
Defendant:
United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. The Tavern at Phipps et al
as 1:2015cv01655
Plaintiff:
Damon Tony Saunders
Defendant:
The Tavern at Phipps, Centraarchy Restaurant Management Co., Greg Greenbaum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
