Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Butler v. Schiralli et al
as 1:2012cv00872
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Butler
Defendant:
David Schiralli, Jon P. Doherty, Darryl J. Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suissa v. Johnson et al
as 1:2011cv01974
Plaintiff:
Steven Suissa
Defendant:
Antonio Johnson, Rodney Middlebrooks, Patrick Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Davidson et al
as 2:2011cv00111
Plaintiff:
Amanda Cruz
Defendant:
Joshua Davidson , Andy Page, John Does 1 - 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thurmon v. Clayton County et al
as 1:2011cv01412
Plaintiff:
Andre Thurmon
Defendant:
Clayton County, Patrick Fleullen, Samuel Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunmore et al v. DeKalb County et al
as 1:2011cv00709
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunmore and Karen Dunmore
Defendant:
DeKalb County , Emmett Lawson and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Gray v. Ector et al
as 3:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
Charles Gray
Defendant:
Moses Ector , Jeffrey Sheppard , Raymond Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodard v. City of Senoia, Georgia et al
as 3:2010cv00186
Plaintiff:
Bonner Woodard, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Senoia, Georgia , Zachary Heinberg and John Does 1 - 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Maddox v. Georgia Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2010cv02742
Plaintiff:
Nicole Maddox
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Human Services , Gwinnett County Department of Family & Children Services , Babette Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. City of East Point et al
as 1:2010cv01975
Plaintiff:
Doreen Gamble
Defendant:
City of East Point , Leander J. Robinson , Terri McNeil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson v. City of Monroe et al
as 1:2010cv01902
Plaintiff:
Oscar Thompson
Defendant:
City of Monroe, Charles Banks, John Mura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
