Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Crisp v. Bills et al
as 1:2008cv01489
Plaintiff:
Nathan Crisp
Defendant:
Nancy Bills, Diane E. Bessen, Patsy Y. Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Doe et al
as 1:2007cv02880
Plaintiff:
Cherl Mitchell
Defendant:
Abe Doe, Bob Doe, Carl Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Mitchell v. Doe et al
as 1:2007mi00338
Plaintiff:
Cherl Mitchell
Defendant:
Abe Doe, Bob Doe, Carl Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Reed et al v. Catoosa County et al
as 4:2007cv00185
Plaintiff:
Jack W. Reed and Jack Reed Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Catoosa County, Catoosa County, Catoosa County and others
Counter Claimant:
Bill Clark, Bill Clark, Bill Clark and others
Counter Defendant:
Jack W. Reed and Jack Reed Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
White v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2007cv01739
Plaintiff:
Tonji White
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Sonny Perdue, Bill Hitchens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007mi00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cole v. Gwinnett County et al
as 1:2007cv00251
Plaintiff:
Carol Cole
Defendant:
Gwinnett County, Doug Daum, Mike Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
