Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Ferguson Sr. v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv02097
Plaintiff:
King B.M. Ferguson Sr. and Blaane A. Oteo
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Charles Mims, Richard Timothy Hamil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Cobble et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
David Cobble and American Citizens
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Brad Raffensperger, Alexander Soros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Appeal, Inc. v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv01079
Plaintiff:
The Appeal, Inc.
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Shawn Emmons, Georgia Attorney Gen Christopher M. Carr and others
Giles v. Jacobs et al
as 1:2023cv05165
Plaintiff:
Oliver Giles
Defendant:
Nick Jacobs, Ryan Kenley and Court Whitten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Goodman et al v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv03057
Plaintiff:
Valancia Goodman and Gregory Maloy
Defendant:
Sheriff/Chief Deputy Levon Allen, Chief Deputy / Sheri Roland Boehrer, Jail Adminisrator Terrance Gibson and others
4Th Party Defendant:
Jail Officer F. Radford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Daly v. Efferth et al
as 2:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
Heather Daly
Defendant:
Halley Efferth, Emily Zilavy, Meradeth Teamer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
