Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Riley v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01567
Plaintiff: Cordero Riley
Defendant: Clayton County, Georgia, Jeffrey Turner, Alieka Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01521
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00232
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00766
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Patterson et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv03279
Plaintiff: Patrick Patterson, Tanner Patterson and Sidney Joseph Patterson
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, William Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00197
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00175
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02416
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Damali v. City of East Point, Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv00741
Plaintiff: Tanner Damali
Defendant: City of East Point, Georgia and Robert C. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Heard et al v. Deal et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Plaintiff: Robert Heard
Defendant: Nathan Deal, Doug Collins, G.B.I. Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?