Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02042
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03435
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01463
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Armstrong v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv05019
Plaintiff: Gregory Armstrong
Defendant: State of Georgia, Nathan Deal, Gwinnett County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Laurence et al
as 1:2015cv01783
Plaintiff: Alexander Patterson, IV
Defendant: Dunn Laurence, Ft. Jackson Army Air Force Dental, Armstrong College Hygentist University and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Floyd County, Georgia et al
as 4:2013cv00050
Plaintiff: Karen Armstrong
Defendant: Floyd County, Georgia , City of Rome, Georgia , Rome-Floyd Parks And Recreation Authority and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02993
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02303
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Mickens v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02134
Plaintiff: Jamal K. Mickens
Defendant: Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Frank J. Ready, Kevin Biederman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00023
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?