Cases 11 - 20 of 185
Brown v. Joe et al
as 1:2023cv02618
Petitioner:
Thomas Matthew Brown
Respondent:
President Biden Joe and First lady K. H.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flavor v. Holt et al
as 1:2023cv02511
Plaintiff:
Kidron Israel Flavor
Defendant:
Connie Holt, Sheriff Markley, Chief Jailer Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02044
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Footman v. Washington et al
as 1:2023cv01999
Plaintiff:
Justin Micheal Footman and Justin Michael Footman
Defendant:
M. Washington, A. Roof and H. Shongo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Lotti et al
as 1:2022cv04193
Plaintiff:
Robert Jerome Wright
Defendant:
Vincent A. Lotti, Darius Pattilo, Sabriya H. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven James Gomez Jr. v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv02469
Plaintiff:
Steven James Gomez Jr.
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail, Officer H. Moore, R. Grady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Kemp et al
as 4:2021cv00134
Plaintiff:
Bryan K. Sims
Defendant:
Gov. Brian Kemp, Department of Corrections, Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rogers v. Bell et al
as 1:2021cv02699
Plaintiff:
David Lee Rogers
Defendant:
Melanie M. Bell, Kimberly D. Degonia, Layla H. Zon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banda v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv02677
Plaintiff:
Alick Ricky Banda
Defendant:
Randy Davis, D. Horton, Chief of Security H. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. State of GA et al
as 1:2021cv02487
Petitioner:
William H. Miller
Respondent:
Hart County and State of GA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
