Cases 11 - 20 of 453
Fambra v. Doe et al
as 4:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Fambra
Defendant:
John Doe and Dr. Richard Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Natt v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv04365
Plaintiff:
LaWayne Natt
Defendant:
United States of America, Bryan Burdick, Officer Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Baskin v. Labott et al
as 1:2023cv03799
Plaintiff:
DeSean M. Baskin
Defendant:
Patrick Labott, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity action.
Braswell v. Langley et al
as 3:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
William Larry Braswell, III
Defendant:
Sherriff Terry Langley, Major David Jordan, Captain Shawn Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fish v. Greene et al
as 1:2023cv03043
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Fish, Jr
Defendant:
Brandon Greene, Corporal "Jane Doe" and Officer Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. William et al
as 1:2023cv02953
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
Colonel William, Colonel Atkins, CtL. Wessenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carruth v. Doe et al
as 4:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Terrence Carruth
Defendant:
John Doe, Jimmy Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. Shoultz et al
as 1:2023cv02659
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
Deputy Shoultz, Boyette, Craig Oupno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burress v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv02636
Petitioner:
Kevin Owen Burress
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Warden John Doe of Robert A Deyton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
