Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Wells v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2011cv01436
Petitioner: Jason Wells
Respondent: Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Zarzour v. Franklin et al
as 4:2010cv00231
Plaintiff: Richard L Zarzour
Defendant: Buzz Franklin, Vic Wells, Marjorie Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Bray, et al
as 2:2010cv00263
Plaintiff: Phillip Clifford Wells, Jr.
Defendant: Barrow County Detention Center, Bray, Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Yeager
as 3:2010cv00177
Petitioner: Clyde Lee Wells
Respondent: Michael S. Yeager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Warren v. Wells et al
as 3:2010cv00150
Plaintiff: Johnny Warren
Defendant: Dexter Wells and Sadie Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright et al v. Polk County et al
as 4:2010cv00136
Plaintiff: Brandon Ed Wright and Byron Scott Wright
Defendant: Polk County, Polk County Board of Commissioners, Haralson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Polk County et al
as 4:2010cv00133
Plaintiff: Byron Scott Wright
Defendant: Polk County, Polk County Board of Commissioners, Haralson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charlton v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01405
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Charlton
Defendant: United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and FNU Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Wells
as 3:2008cv00024
Petitioner: Keith Patterson
Respondent: Dexter Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stallings v. Sutton et al
as 4:2007cv00028
Plaintiff: Carlos Laron Stallings
Defendant: Richard Sutton, David Gafnea, Sheli Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?