Cases 81 - 90 of 19,117
Johnson v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv01706
Plaintiff:
Antonio Darnell Johnson
Defendant:
Levon Allen, Clayton County Police Department and Clayton County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Ward et al
as 1:2024cv00967
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Bennett
Defendant:
Timothy Ward and Terry E Barnard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Batten v. McBurney
as 1:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
Emory Batten
Defendant:
Judge McBurney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fair v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv01666
Plaintiff:
Mywan D. Fair
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01652
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Castillanos v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv01656
Petitioner:
Eduardo Castillanos
Defendant:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stocks v. City of Rome et al
as 4:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Keith Obryann Stocks, Keith Obryann Stocks Trust, Keith Obryann Stocks Estate and others
Defendant:
City of Rome, Floyd County Sheriff's Department, 2 Unknown Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vass v. Brawner
as 1:2024cv01661
Petitioner:
Christopher Aaron Vass
Respondent:
Director Ronald Brawner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. Reynolds
as 1:2024cv01604
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff Frank Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
