Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Johnson v. Geo Secure Services et al
as 1:2022cv01420
Plaintiff:
Arthur Antonio Johnson
Defendant:
Geo Secure Services, D. Bryne, R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. United States
as 1:2020cv01482
Defendant:
United States, William T. Moore, Christopher Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Karteau O. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince et al v. Georgia Department of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2017cv02687
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tiger D. Prince, Timothy Adams, Nick R. Smith and others
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Pardons and Paroles, Stan Shepard, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Smith et al
as 1:2015cv02233
Plaintiff:
Quentin O. Smith
Defendant:
Arsenio R. Smith and Kevin J. Hopson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rayner v. Cobb County et al
as 1:2015cv00501
Plaintiff:
Barry W. Rayner
Defendant:
Cobb County, Cobb County Adult Detention Center, Donald L. Bartlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. O'Kelly et al
as 1:2013cv02507
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
William O'Kelly, E. Clayton Scofield, Sam Olens and others
Heard v. O'Kelly et al
as 1:2013cv02105
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
William C. O'Kelly, C. Ashley Royal, E. Clayton Scofield and others
Dyess v. Barrow County Detention Center et al
as 2:2012cv00055
Plaintiff:
Phillip Scott Dyess
Defendant:
Barrow County Detention Center and R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Pannell et al
as 1:2011cv04021
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Charles A. Pannell, Jr., E. Clayton Scofield, III, B. Avant Edenfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMillian v. Smith
as 1:2011cv03104
Petitioner:
Dustin McMillian
Respondent:
Clyde R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
