Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Gonzalez-Rodriguez v. Thomas
as 1:2024cv00648
Petitioner:
Arley Gonzalez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv03228
Petitioner:
Rolando Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Castro-Rodriguez v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02691
Petitioner:
Jhon Castro-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden S. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodriguez v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Elvis Rodriguez
Defendant:
Unknown and Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard et al v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Cornelius A. Howard, Davoric Tilman, Michael Anthony Thomas and others
Defendant:
Sgt. C. Reynold, Capt. Deese, Major Duane Whisenhunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv05148
Petitioner:
Lilia Martinez Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GATES et al v. LONG et al
as 4:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
RODRIGUEZ S GATES, JABBAR PINKSTON, JAHLAND BROWN and others
Defendant:
Michael Long, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PELFREYS, COII David Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Superior Court Gwinnett Co et al
as 1:2021cv02531
Defendant:
Superior Court Gwinnett Co and District Attorney Patsy Gatson
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Guzman Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Santiago et al v. Reynolds
as 1:2021cv00736
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Par, Jaivus Newton, Travis Wilson and others
Defendant:
Frank Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
