Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Whipple v. Unknown
as 4:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Desmond Lee Whipple, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whipple v. Coastal State Prison
as 4:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Desmond Lee Whipple, Sr.
Defendant:
Coastal State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whipple v. Paulding County Detention Center
as 4:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Desmond Lee Whipple, Sr.
Defendant:
Paulding County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinkston et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2023cv02887
Plaintiff:
Jabarr Desmond Pinkston
Defendant:
Sheriff Ezell Brown, Major Sammy Banks, Captain Brice Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Post v. Mims
as 1:2023cv01448
Petitioner:
Desmond Post
Respondent:
Warden Charles Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Humphrey v. Desmond et al
as 1:2023cv00726
Plaintiff:
Montay Desmond Humphrey
Defendant:
Conor P. Desmond, U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Post v. Mims et al
as 1:2023cv00522
Petitioner:
Desmond Post
Respondent:
Charles Mims and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brumfield v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00374
Petitioner:
Cornell Desmond Brumfield
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Clements v. Fulton County Jail Officers et al
as 3:2021cv00133
Plaintiff:
Desmond Sullvian Clements
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail Officers, Officer Bougle and Officer Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
