Cases 31 - 40 of 1,824
Hollowell v. Tripp
as 1:2024cv00659
Petitioner:
Jo'Von Montell Hollowell
Respondent:
Warden B. Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Gordon v. Georgia CVS Pharmacy, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Glenn Gordon
Defendant:
Georgia CVS Pharmacy, LLC, Corporate Defendant A and Corporate Defendant B
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Dickerson v. Southeastern Psychological Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Kelly Dickerson
Defendant:
Southeastern Psychological Associates, Inc. and Priscilla B. Faulkner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
