Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Allen v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01232
Plaintiff: Belinda Allen
Defendant: Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gatson v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01231
Plaintiff: Tokyo Gatson
Defendant: Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gatson v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01233
Plaintiff: Daniel Gatson, Jr.
Defendant: Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gatson et al v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01036
Plaintiff: Tokyo Gatson, Belinda Allen, Daniel Gatson, Jr. and others
Defendant: Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth et al v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al
as 4:2014cv00206
Plaintiff: David Booth and Paula Booth
Defendant: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation , Mandy Bandy and Teems & Teems Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Howard v. Anderson et al
as 2:2014cv00084
Plaintiff: Lamont Howard
Defendant: Kathleen Anderson, Andrew Akins, J. Bradley Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv00253
Petitioner: William Franklin Booth
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00142
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Booth v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv00134
Petitioner: William Franklin Booth
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Booth v. Aurora Bank FSB et al
as 1:2012cv01817
Plaintiff: Constance Booth
Defendant: Aurora Bank FSB , Aurora Loan Services, LLC and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?