Cases 71 - 80 of 308
Myers et al v. Goedken et al
as 1:2019cv02486
Defendant:
Atlanta VA Medical Center, Alfredo Nieves-Gonzalez and Jennifer Goedken
Plaintiff:
Kaci C. Myers
Gonzalez v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01539
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Zak et al
as 1:2018cv05774
Defendant:
Claud III Clark, Robert M McCullough, Nancy Zak and others
Plaintiff:
United States
Special Master:
Carlos A. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7407
Gonzalez v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv05410
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Charleen Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Johnson v. County of Paulding, Georgia et al
as 4:2018cv00136
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
County of Paulding, Georgia, Board of Commissioners for Paulding County, Paulding County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dey et al v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2018cv02672
Plaintiff:
Diva Lyri Dey and Laree Quinette Day
Defendant:
Guillermo Gonzalez, Ana Maria Becerra, Gerardo Americo Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ashley Abramson v. Equifax Inc.
as 1:2018cv01466
Plaintiff:
Ashley Abramson, Kimberly Dawn Alvarez , Edwin Jeffrey Amador and others
Defendant:
Equifax Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diaz-Gonzalez v. Baily International of Atlanta, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00970
Plaintiff:
Jose Diaz-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Baily International of Atlanta, Inc. and Jeff Tsai
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
