Cases 81 - 90 of 1,681
Kitchens v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kitchens
Defendant:
Warden Josha Jones and Dr. Carowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Jones
as 4:2023cv00241
Petitioner:
Abdul Crawford
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Jones v. Camden Development, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04745
Plaintiff:
Jay Jones
Defendant:
Camden Development, Inc. doing business as Camden Midtown Atlanta Apartments and John Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Park Vista Apartments et al v. Homes of Light, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04735
Plaintiff:
Park Vista Apartments and Ventana Capital
Defendant:
Homes of Light, LLC, Willie Jones and Harold Clark
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hitchcock v. Jones
as 4:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Aaron Hitchcock
Defendant:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Georgia v. Jones
as 1:2023cv04613
Plaintiff:
State of Georgia
Defendant:
Justin Errol Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sheets v Jones
as 4:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Ricky Sheets
Defendant:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hai'le v. The Pep Boys - Manny, Moe, & Jack, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04578
Plaintiff:
Hai'le I. Nas'eer and Nas'eer I. Hai'le
Defendant:
Icahn Automotive Group, LLC doing business as The Pep Boys - Manny Moe & Jack, Icahn Enterprises L.P., John Doe 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
