Cases 81 - 88 of 88
Mathis v. HSBC Bank USA
as 1:2008cv02035
Plaintiff:
Teresa N. Mathis
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA
Cause Of Action: 28:l332 Diversity - Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rangel et al v. Forsyth County et al
as 2:2008cv00023
Plaintiff:
Sallie Ann Rangel and Sergio Rangel
Defendant:
Forsyth County, Forsyth County, Ted Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rangel et al v. Forsyth County et al
as 2:2007cv00142
Plaintiff:
Sallie Ann Rangel and Sergio Rangel
Defendant:
Forsyth County, Ted Paxton, Terri Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Hall v. Freeman et al
as 1:2007cv00831
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Hall and Cynthia Hall
Defendant:
Myron Freeman, Myron Freeman, Myron Freeman and others
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bell et al v. Roanoke Companies Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00687
Plaintiff:
Michael Bell, Michelle Bennett, Sirena Bernal and others
Defendant:
Roanoke Companies Group, Inc., Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., SLR, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Innovative Chemical Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adams et al v. Roanoke Companies Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00686
Plaintiff:
Walter Adams, Walter Adams, Walter Adams and others
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., SLR, Inc., Aerofil Technology, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
SLR, Inc. and Ortec, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., SLR, Inc., Aerofil Technology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
