Cases 1 - 10 of 2,429
Smith v. East Atlanta Cardiology, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02587
Plaintiff:
Brandon Smith
Defendant:
East Atlanta Cardiology, LLC and Muthayyah Srinivasan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Smith v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv02529
Plaintiff:
Marcus Smith
Defendant:
John Doe, Customized Logistics Services, Inc. and Old Republic Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Smith v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv02514
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. K Trucking LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02470
Plaintiff:
Onike Smith
Defendant:
K Trucking LLC, Protective Insurance Company and Carlton Mitchelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Smith v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv02392
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Smith
Defendant:
Robert Wilson, GNS Trucking Inc., ACE Property and Casualty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Allen v. All 7 continents et al
as 4:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Defendant:
All 7 continents, Mas-Govt., MD Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v All 7 Continents et al
as 4:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Defendant:
All 7 continents, Millsapp, Dow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
