Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Davenport v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv00140
Plaintiff: Gregory Allen Davenport
Defendant: Joshua Jones, Nicholas Stewart and Steven Kendrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Ward
as 4:2022cv00150
Petitioner: Gregory Allen Davenport
Respondent: Timothy Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davenport v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2022cv00096
Plaintiff: Gregory Allen Davenport
Defendant: State of Georgia, Mrs. McGee, Mr. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redwine Investment Group LLC v. Allen
as 1:2020cv00634
Plaintiff: Redwine Investment Group LLC
Defendant: Gregory Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02807
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ward v. Conway et al
as 1:2015cv02598
Petitioner: Gregory Allen Ward
Respondent: Butch Conway, Warren Davis and Danny Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Yates v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00300
Plaintiff: Gregory Allen Yates
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tonkin v. Blue Ridge Mountain Electric Membership Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv00221
Plaintiff: Margaret Tonkin
Defendant: Blue Ridge Mountain Electric Membership Corporation and Gregory Allen Kuykendall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. NEWTON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 1:2012cv01673
Plaintiff: GREGORY ALLEN SMITH
Defendant: Newton County Sheriff's Office, Flowers and Cambell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silverton Bank, N.A. v. Chapman et al
as 1:2009cv00795
Defendant: Phillip C. Chapman, Eligio Pena and Gregory Allen Fornelli
Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Negotiable Instrumen

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?