Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Daniel v. The Hertz Corporation
as 1:2023cv04663
Plaintiff:
Crystal Daniel
Defendant:
The Hertz Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gale v. The Hertz Corporation
as 1:2016cv04801
Plaintiff:
Michael Gale
Defendant:
The Hertz Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al v. The Hertz Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00177
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
The Hertz Corporation, Ameriguard Risk Retention Group, Inc., Jacqueline Denison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
The Hertz Corporation et al v. Denison et al
as 2:2015cv00214
Plaintiff:
The Hertz Corporation and Ameriguard Risk Retention Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Jacqueline Denison, Daniel Rush and State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Page v. The Hertz Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv01965
Plaintiff:
Dedrick Page , Dominic Jackson and Angela Brown
Defendant:
The Hertz Corporation and Hertz Local Edition Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
