Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Troutman v. Arch Insurance Company et al
as 1:2022cv00999
Plaintiff:
Sharon Troutman
Defendant:
Arch Insurance Company, Karr Transportation, Inc. and Richard Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00272
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1683
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02940
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1683
Muhammad et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2019cv05357
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A., Troutman & Sanders, L.P., Aldrige Pite, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Dorothea Muhammad and Ali S. Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Edgemoor Management LLC. v. Evans et al
as 1:2019cv04589
Defendant:
Naaman D. Evans and Atesha J. Troutman
Plaintiff:
Edgemoor Management LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LaCount v. Spalding County Juvenile Court et al
as 3:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Joseph LaCount
Defendant:
Spalding County Juvenile Court, Spalding County Dept. of Family & Children Services, Karen M. Calloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. GMAC et al
as 1:2016cv01616
Plaintiff:
Alfredia Pruitt
Defendant:
GMAC, McCurdy & Candler, USAA Federal Savings Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCreary v. Troutman et al
as 1:2015cv02779
Plaintiff:
Duncan Eric McCreary
Defendant:
Michael Anthony Troutman and Michael Jack Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Troutman v. DeKalb Fire E.M.S. Services et al
as 1:2013cv01097
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. Troutman
Defendant:
DeKalb Fire E.M.S. Services and DeKalb Police Department
Williams et al v. City of Stone Mountain et al
as 1:2012cv02755
Plaintiff:
Arthur Williams , Dionne Davis and Vincent Crossby
Defendant:
City of Stone Mountain, Barry Amos, Patricia Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
