Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Zeigler v. Maddox
as 1:2021cv03746
Plaintiff:
Scott Zeigler
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox, DeKalb County Jail and DeKalb County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zeigler v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv01691
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Zina Zeigler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brewer v. Method Test Prep, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02331
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Brewer
Defendant:
Method Test Prep, Inc., Frank McWilliams, Brian Zeigler and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Zeigler v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01440
Plaintiff:
Karen Zeigler
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Samson et al v. Manlove et al
as 1:2014cv03661
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Samson, Rebecca M. Wilson, Travis Munden and others
Defendant:
George Manlove , Paul Nisbet and John Does 1-10
Consol_defendant:
Jill Manlove , Rob Standley , Mark Hopwood and others
Respondent:
GE Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation
Samson et al v. Manlove et al
as 1:2014mi00116
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Samson, Rebecca M. Wilson, Travis Munden and others
Defendant:
George Manlove , Paul Nisbet and John Does 1-10
Consol_defendant:
Jill Manlove , Rob Standley , Mark Hopwood and others
Respondent:
GE Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation
Zeigler et al v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as 1:2014cv00374
Plaintiff:
Glynn Zeigler and Frances Zeigler
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zeigler v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 1:2012cv04389
Plaintiff:
Steven Zeigler
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ruth v. Zeigler et al
as 1:2010cv00932
Plaintiff:
Robin W. Ruth
Defendant:
Todd E. Zeigler and Atlanta Orthopedics
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
