Cases 1 - 10 of 10
KNIGHT v. BEASLEY et al
as 3:2021cv00030
Defendant:
Jacob Beasley, CHIEF COUNSELOR Cynthia Stewert, Counselor Veronica Stewart and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Carnell Knight and Antony Carnell Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. Shepard, et al.
as 1:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tiger D. Prince
Defendant:
Elizabeth Roberts, V. Brown, Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Upshaw v. Hall et al
as 3:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
Todd Upshaw
Defendant:
Phillip Hall, Barbara Grant, Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Wilkes et al
as 4:2010cv00048
Plaintiff:
Lamont Howard
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes, Ayaz Chaudhary, Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Wilkes et al
as 3:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
Lamont Howard
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes, Ayaz Chaudhary, Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles Members of Boards
as 1:2008cv00026
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Knight
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles Members of Boards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jacobs v Adelman, et al.
as 5:2008cv00019
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lee Jacobs
Defendant:
David Adelman, Michael Boggs, Richard E. Currie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Homer v. Walker et al
as 1:2008cv00014
Plaintiff:
Emmett Homer
Defendant:
Victor Walker, James Donald, V. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lewallen v. Walker et al
as 1:2008cv00012
Plaintiff:
James Lewallen
Defendant:
Victor Walker, James Donald, V. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Upton et al
as 6:2007cv00059
Plaintiff:
James Peterson
Defendant:
Stephen Upton, John Brown, John W. Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
