Cases 91 - 100 of 10,264
Johnson et al v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Defendant:
Keith Higgins, Jackie Johnson and Johnnie Hobbs
Plaintiff:
Keith Higgins, Jackie Johnson and Johnnie Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Charles B. Webster Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00108
Defendant:
Charles B. Webster Detention Center, LT Cheatam, Sergeant Curlyer and others
Plaintiff:
Dion Antwon Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. McFarlane et al
as 3:2024cv00050
Defendant:
Jimmy Kellum, Deputy William Sikes, Andrew McFarlane and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Payne and Alexander Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00139
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Horton v. Jones
as 6:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Quentin Horton
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Levy v. McKinny et al
as 4:2024cv00138
Defendant:
Alyssa Price, Zackary Weber, Romine Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Charles C. Levy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latimore v. Hall et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Defendant:
Warden Tonji Keith, Atrium Health Navicent Hospital, Dr. Sydney Pilinko and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Latimore and Dewon Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coote v. Warden, Folkston ICE Processing Center
as 5:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Shevon Coote
Respondent:
Warden, Folkston ICE Processing Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Houze v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00083
Respondent:
Warden G. Swaney
Petitioner:
Arthur Houze and Authur Houze
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
