Cases 11 - 20 of 153
Long v. Beasley et al
as 6:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Timothy Long
Defendant:
Warden Beasley, Commissary Dept. Workers, Food Service Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Chatham County Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Eric Christopher Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Chatham County Sheriffs Office, Cpl. White, Dep. Salace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Berry et al
as 3:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Mack Rice
Defendant:
Warden Berry, Martin and Sgt. Padraza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dinkle v. Conley et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Steven Joshua Dinkle
Defendant:
J. Conley, Mrs. Barnes, S. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Adams et al
as 6:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Nolan Craig Martin
Defendant:
Warden Adams, Warden Chambers and Mr. Tool
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Bobbitt et al
as 6:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Kevias Jackson
Defendant:
Warden Trevonza Bobbitt, Unit Manager Jawaka Johnson, Sergeant Ronnie Shuemake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Islas v. DHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel-ATD
as 3:2023cv00002
Petitioner:
Jose Martin Islas
Respondent:
DHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel-ATD
Molina v. Morgan et al
as 2:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Molina
Defendant:
HSA Morgan, Dr. Martin, J. Fikes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00158
Petitioner:
Junior Martin Hernandez
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone and Warden, USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Heath et al v. Adams et al
as 6:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Antonio Heath, Crishaun Heath, Christen Heath and others
Defendant:
Warden Brian Adams, Joseph Barnes, Quan Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
