Cases 11 - 20 of 10,123
Singleton v. United States Of America
as 4:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Arthur Singleton
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Isaac v. Dozier et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Eugene Isaac
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Timothy Ward and Ahmed Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. United States Of America
as 4:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Dontray Lewis
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Henderson v. SRS Nuclear Power et al
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Tavarres Henderson
Defendant:
SRS Nuclear Power and Christopher M. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Bernard et al
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Tavarres Henderson
Defendant:
Mr Terry Bernard and State of Georgia Pardons & Paroles Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dupont v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Omega Demetrius Dupont
Respondent:
G Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gillespie v. Young et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert David Gillespie, Sr.
Defendant:
Lt. S. Young, Deputy Smith, Deputy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Green et al
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Rashad Jenkins
Defendant:
Audwon Green and Mr. Screws
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Swaney et al
as 2:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
Terrell Mack
Respondent:
Warden Swaney and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hasuan v. Dept. of Community Supervision et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Asaad Amir Hasuan
Defendant:
Dept. of Community Supervision, Michael Bray and William Mobley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
