Cases 51 - 60 of 65
Carswell v. Whittle et al
as 1:2012cv00066
Plaintiff:
James Jackson Carswell
Defendant:
Clay Whittle, FNU Carani, S. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bacon v. Emanuel County Federal Jail Unit et al
as 6:2011cv00120
Plaintiff:
Franklin Lamar Bacon
Defendant:
Emanuel County Federal Jail Unit, Martie, U.S. Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Mundy et al
as 4:2011cv00264
Plaintiff:
Marshall Durell Brown
Defendant:
Brian A. Mundy, Gary Provost and Jimmy McDuffie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. United States Of America
as 1:2011cv00097
Petitioner:
Arthur J. Marshall, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Grier v. Lemley et al
as 1:2010cv00030
Plaintiff:
Isaac Grier
Defendant:
James Lemley, Chris Durden and Logan Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. United States Federal Courts et al
as 5:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jessie Joenathan Roberts
Defendant:
United States Federal Courts, United States Attorney, DEA Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NIXON v. SMITH
as 2:2010cv00005
Petitioner:
Marshall L. Nixon
Respondent:
Hugh A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NIXON v. SMITH
as 3:2009cv00100
Petitioner:
Marshall L. Nixon
Respondent:
Hugh A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Foskey v. Lawson
as 5:2009cv00055
Plaintiff:
Marshall H. Foskey
Defendant:
Hugh Lawson and Timothy Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gelis v. D. Ray Correctional Facility, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
Steve Gelis
Defendant:
D. Ray Correctional Facility, Inc., Jackson, Harden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
