Cases 81 - 90 of 10,140
Jackson v. Perry et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Trevelis D. Jackson
Defendant:
Counselor Perry, Correctional Officer Guyton, Sgt. Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Glynn County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Clinton Taylor
Defendant:
Glynn County Detention Center, Mrs. Harris and Mr. Wooten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hasuan v. Dept. of Community Supervision et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Asaad Amir Hasuan
Defendant:
Dept. of Community Supervision, Michael Bray and William Mobley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. County of Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Frederick Radford
Defendant:
County of Johnson, Brian Chambers, Judge for Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Fitz
as 2:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Scotty Wayne Henry
Respondent:
Warden Johnny Fitz
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myers v. Adams
as 6:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Daniel Alonzo Myers
Defendant:
Warden Robert Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
Eric Lashawn Hayes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Dupont v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Omega Demetrius Dupont
Respondent:
G Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hasuan v. Dillman
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Asaad Amir Hasuan
Defendant:
Dr. S. Dillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hasuan v. Ferra et al
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Asaad Amir Hasuan
Defendant:
Major George Ferra, Sheriff E. Neal Jump and Glynn County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
