Cases 1 - 10 of 10,261
Dye v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
Frankie Dye
Respondent:
Warden G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Everett v. United States Of America
as 1:2024cv00166
Respondent:
United States Of America
Petitioner:
Marcus Joseph Everett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Smith v. Garland et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Respondent:
Collete Peters, G. Swaney, D. Nogle and others
Petitioner:
Robert M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nash v. McFarlane et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Nash
Defendant:
Andrew McFarlane, Sgt. Moore, Cert Officer Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Capehart v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Defendant:
Warden Shawn Gillis, Dr. Neav, J. Randall Sauls and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Capehart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyes v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00107
Respondent:
Warden G. Swaney
Petitioner:
Alberto Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morena v. Danforth
as 5:2024cv00069
Petitioner:
Luis Hernandez Morena
Unknown:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Respondent:
William Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ayala v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ayala
Respondent:
Warden G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Goins v. Freeman
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Dale Dean Goins
Defendant:
Lynn Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heyward v. Savannah Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Jamond Heyward
Defendant:
Janessa Stalter, Aaron Mitchell, Savannah Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
