Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Holmes et al v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes, Sr., Micky Eugene Hamilton, Jed Allen Taylor and others
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, John T. Wilcher, Chatham County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naji v. City of Augusta et al
as 1:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Issac Ali Naji
Defendant:
City of Augusta, Richmond County Sheriff's Office, Officer Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaither v. Bryson et al
as 1:2021cv00001
Defendant:
Carol W. Bragg, Warden Mr. Philbin, Gwen Robertson and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Gaither
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Tinger et al
as 1:2014cv00078
Plaintiff:
Davis Tate, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Tinger, FNU Robertson and Stan Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Finger et al
as 1:2014cv00052
Plaintiff:
Davis Tate, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Finger, FNU Robertson and Stan Sherperd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Johnson
as 1:2013cv00036
Petitioner:
Patrick L. Robertson
Respondent:
Glen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Johnson
as 1:2013cv00023
Petitioner:
Patrick L. Robertson
Respondent:
Glen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Robertson
as 5:2011cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tyrone E. Brown
Defendant:
Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Hickey
as 2:2009cv00098
Petitioner:
Rafael Robertson
Respondent:
Deborah A. Hickey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pawlak v. Groves et al
as 1:2009cv00068
Plaintiff:
James Robertson Pawlak
Defendant:
Benjamin Scott Groves and Marc Stephen Cappa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.